Do I need to hire a second shooter?

[Read Time - 4 minutes]

Short answer - perhaps.

The longer and more detailed answer - Let's discuss.

Now, I'm pretty confident that most well-established wedding photographers would say, "Yes, of course, you need a second shooter," buuuut I'm not like most well-established wedding photographers.

For the first half of my two-decade career, I shot solo with no second shooter and was very happy, if I do say so myself.

I shot big weddings and really big weddings and small weddings and even smaller weddings.

So when did I decide to change or the better question is WHY did I change?

For me, it was a decision of quality and logistics.

I have always been more than happy to shoot a wedding by myself. Shooting the prep wasn't a problem. Shooting the reception was never a problem. I never had any problem with the ceremony, but in some instances, I wanted more.

At an outdoor wedding, I can roam free! I move from side to side and get every possible angle from behind the guests with no trouble whatsoever.

The only challenge with outdoor ceremonies is the limited time to get all the shots I want (they're typically short).

Indoor or church weddings are traditionally longer, but access is more restricted...and I can't run around.

During the ceremony, for example, I'll get shots "down Broadway," as I call it, which means shooting right down the center of the aisle from somewhere in the back half of the church. This is common.

I also like getting a shot of the bride looking into the eyes of the groom when they're facing each other during the vows, as well as the same shot of the groom looking at his soon-to-be-wife. This requires me to move quickly but quietly from one side to the other.

I'll also get a shot from the balcony if there is one and a variety of angles in between.

I CAN get all of these angles by myself and have for years, but I have to hustle. This is where a second shooter becomes really valuable.

I typically position them on the groom's side of the church, looking towards the bride, gazing lovingly at her husband-to-be.

At this angle, they can also get the bridesmaids, the cute flower girls, the parents in the front (very tough for me to shoot from the back) and anything creative they can squeeze in while still focusing on the bride.

This leaves me time to focus on everything else (groom, guys, Broadway and balcony) and NOT have to worry about the most important person in the room, the bride.

Once I saw the value of this opportunity, I could shoot more, different, and even better shots, especially at more restrictive venues like churches. And anything I can do to get better photos for my couples is always a huge plus!

The second bonus, which was my biggest surprise is help with the first dance. This typically comes at the beginning of the reception when the couple first arrives.

I would do my thing with my trusty 24-70mm, getting the wide and medium shots, and my second shooter would use a 70-200mm to get some great close-ups - something I could never shoot before.

Once the first dance is over, the rest of the evening is all mine, and I let my second take the rest of the night off.

Of course, every photographer has a different way of working with their second shooter, but that does bring up a good point. How you treat your fellow photographers is very important.

I'm not fond of the word "assistant." I prefer to use "associate photographer," and I also prefer to treat those who shoot with me as a partner, not a subordinate. Perhaps it's just me, but when you're working WITH someone rather than FOR someone, you tend to care more - about your work and who you're working for.

I want my associates to care about both.

Now, I will add a word of caution from one professional to another.

At the end of the day, YOU are ultimately responsible for the photos delivered to your couple. If your associate doesn't get what you need, that's on you.

You're also responsible for helping your associate know what to shoot and how to shoot it to your standards.

Do your due diligence and either train or communicate with your associate so you both know what to expect from each other. Like anything else, communication is the key to success.

So, CAN you be a profitable wedding photographer without using a second shooter? Of course, you can.

Is it better to have a second (or third) photographer with you? I suppose that depends on the logistics of the venues and the scope of the day you desire to cover, but in short, there are certainly more advantages to having some help than disadvantages.

Like many things when running your business, the decision is yours, but when you, as a professional photographer, can put aside your need to be the main guy ahead of delivering the very best for your client, you become a true professional.

Whether you use a second shooter or not is just one of the little parts of the "inner game of wedding photography," THIS is what I write about each week in this newsletter.

I’ve written more about becoming a second shooter. Issue #15, in fact is on this exact topic. You can read it here if you’re interested.

And if you want to be notified each Sunday morning when a new issue is posted, pop your email in and subscribe for free.

Questions? Shoot me an email at [email protected]